NZ Rugby Governance Review – What It Means for Boards

BoardWorks is pleased to have assisted with this major governance review of the New Zealand Rugby Union.

This is a fascinating study considering whether the Incorporated Society model remains best suited to a large international business and a complex domestic environment.

The Review Panel’s full report can be found here (PDF 10.7MB).

A print ready PDF version can be found here (PDF 64MB).

Related Articles

It happens: a director “hears things” about the Chief Executive. Danger zone. This piece sets out a practical path—verify before acting, keep the whole board involved, focus on organisational impact (not personality), and use a fair, transparent process if an investigation is needed.
Roger Martin keeps strategy practical: define the real problem, explore ‘possibility portraits’, choose what rivals can’t or won’t copy, then enforce—and adjust as conditions change. We’ve summarised his key steps and why they align with policy-driven governance and cascading decisions.
Plenty of organisations invest in developing people—until they reach the boardroom. The data shows many boards still avoid meaningful evaluation, often because it feels uncomfortable. This piece summarises the stats, common pitfalls (from “FIGJAM” to confidentiality fears), and practical steps to make reviews constructive rather than cosmetic.

Let’s Chat About Your Governance Goals

Every board faces unique challenges and opportunities.

If you’re curious about improving your board’s effectiveness or exploring new strategies, let’s start with a no-obligation conversation. Share your goals, ask questions, and learn more about how Boardworks can support you – no strings attached.